Monday, March 1, 2010

Ralph Waldo Emerson, meet the concept of moderation

"A man should learn to detect and watch that gleam of light which flashes across his mind from within, more than the lustre of the firmament of bards and sages. Yet he dismisses without notice his thought, because it is his."

In all honesty (like I'd ever be one to give any less than that), I was really overwhelmed by Emerson's piece. It was obviously very well-written--nearly every sentence seemed as though its formation had been considered extremely carefully and as though it could stand alone and still produce high impact--yet that was almost my problem with it. Emerson's writing, intentional or not, was just too heavy for me. Tone it down, Ralphie. . .

Anyway, from what I did manage to absorb and appreciate, I did find several lines that I liked a lot for the lovely way they were crafted and for the insightfulness I sensed behind them, the aforementioned quote being one of those.

I found this statement to be very truthful and appropriate support for the advice Emerson seemed to be pushing throughout the piece. Many people do underestimate the power and quality of their own ideas simply because they are the ones to think of them. It's as though some, myself included, can't trust that an idea could be a good one--or, what's more, one of the best ones--and theirs simultaneously, which is what Emerson seemed to be saying we need to overcome to keep the world moving.

Also, the message that Emerson appeared to be to presenting in this article was that of a need for fresh ideas from all people. As a result of this, he used lines like this to stress the importance of faith in one's thoughts because it is this faith that leads to the originality Emerson was convinced we needed or, at the very least, could always use.

Personally and as always (almost), I am torn by this point that Emerson seems to be trying to get across. Part of me is in agreement with the implications that lines like the one mentioned earlier and others found throughout the reading offer that belief in your own ideas is not only important but necessary for development. However, I also feel that Emerson's argument was a little contradictory and incorrect.

For example, if everyone focuses on his own original thoughts and develops his own great ideas, there doesn't appear to be much room for believing in the potential of anyone else's idea. Emerson believed that we'll achieve nothing if we don't believe in the power of our ideas, but I don't see how we can achieve much more than nothing if we're the only ones who believe in our ideas too. I think that the real method to progress and accomplishment involves a balance between having faith in your own ideas and having faith in the ideas of others because in helping them execute their ideas, you put yourself in a better place to receive help executing your own later on, thus attaining more overall.

5 comments:

  1. I think, like all philosophy, this has to be taken with a grain of salt. If we're talking about believing solely in our own ideas, then yes, there is no room for others. We also would then disregard this piece by Emerson altogether--PARADOX! So we have to learn that it can be our idea to accept what others have said before, otherwise we'd always have to start over!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thelma-
    First, may I say that I thouroughly enjoyed the "tone it down, Ralphie" line. It almost brought a tear to my eye. Anyway, I would agree that it seems a little off to say that we should only believe in our own ideas. If everyone believes in his or her own ideas but doesn't ever take the time to consider others' ideas, where is that going to take us? Probably nowhere. And even if someone has good ideas, maybe someone else's ideas in addition to theirs would make it even better.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AGREED! somewhat... i am with you on the overwhelming part. there is a lot to digest and a lot of thoughts are thrown your way during the reading. what i dont exactly agree with you on is the last two paragraphs.

    Yes we need to give credit to the thoughts and ideas we have but i dont think his point was that we should only give acknowledgement to our own thoughts. its a given fact that in life we will be presented with other ideas and philoshophies but we need to give our own ideas their rightful place beside, or in front of depending on the situation, other ideas

    well written and nice work

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh Ali. How I've missed thee. You bring up an awesome point, and you definitely challenged what I had originally thought about this piece! What you're saying is awesome--yes, we need to think for ourselves, but that doesn't mean that we need to think about only ourselves. How is it possible for us to grow as a society if we're always challenging what each other think? Or, maybe, how is it possible for us to not grow as a society if we're always challenging what each other think? I think it's necessary to contradict each other--we're humans, no one is right all the time--but it cannot overshadow our own personal beliefs to a point where we don't even understand what we believe. Okay, I'm rambling (and quite frankly, I don't even understand exactly what point I'm trying to make here), but basically what I'm trying to say is awesome post! You really made me think.

    PS: I like that you use dashes a lot. It makes your writing more exciting. I love rhymes.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I thought that the main point of Emerson's writing was to point out the evils in society; but, he also did put forth the point that you recognize and I agree that there needs to be a balance between accepting other peoples' ideas and relying on our own. The main thought that I got out of his writing was that we should strive to be individual, though.

    ReplyDelete